Technology
How the Defence Sector Is Struggling to Attract the Talent It Urgently Needs

A promising career that does not feel right
As the defence sector ramps up recruitment to meet growing security demands, it is finding that many skilled graduates remain hesitant. Caleb, a recent computer science graduate, encountered defence as one of the few industries actively hiring when he entered the job market. The pay was competitive, the career progression clear, and the promise of long term stability appealing. Yet he ultimately chose to walk away. The idea that his work could contribute to lethal systems left him uncomfortable, a moral hesitation shared by many in his generation.
This unease highlights a deeper challenge facing defence employers. While the sector can offer financial and professional incentives, it often struggles to align with the personal values of young engineers, developers, and scientists who have alternative opportunities in civilian technology industries.
Ethical concerns meet fierce market competition
Moral reservations are only part of the problem. Defence companies and military bodies now compete directly with global technology firms for the same pool of highly skilled workers. Artificial intelligence specialists, cybersecurity experts, and software engineers are in high demand across nearly every sector. For many candidates, commercial technology roles offer not only ethical distance from warfare but also flexible working environments, high salaries, and reputations for innovation.
The defence industry, traditionally seen as rigid and hierarchical, often appears less attractive by comparison. This perception makes recruitment particularly difficult at a time when modern warfare increasingly relies on advanced digital capabilities rather than traditional hardware alone.
Government ambitions clash with workforce realities
The skills shortage is becoming more pronounced as government defence ambitions expand. Earlier this year, the UK Ministry of Defence announced major investments in AI driven battlefield systems alongside the creation of a new Cyber and Electromagnetic Command. These initiatives reflect the changing nature of defence, where data, networks, and automation play a central role.
However, the workforce needed to deliver these projects is already stretched thin. Specialists in artificial intelligence, cyber operations, and electronic warfare are precisely the same professionals sought by banks, startups, and multinational technology companies. Without a compelling value proposition, defence risks being left behind.
Education gaps feeding long term shortages
Another layer of the crisis lies earlier in the talent pipeline. Government assessments have repeatedly pointed to a strong demand for STEM skills across defence, alongside concerns that the school system is not producing enough graduates with the right technical foundations. Shortages are not limited to advanced digital roles. The sector also lacks skilled trades such as welders, electrical engineers, and maintenance specialists who remain essential to defence manufacturing and infrastructure.
At the same time, emerging priorities such as green technologies and energy efficiency introduce new skill requirements, further widening the gap between supply and demand.
Economic consequences beyond national security
The impact of the skills crisis extends beyond military readiness. The government has positioned defence as a potential engine of economic growth, capable of supporting advanced manufacturing, regional development, and high value exports. Persistent labour shortages threaten these ambitions by slowing project delivery and increasing costs.
Without targeted investment in education, retraining, and cultural reform within the sector, defence risks losing its ability to innovate at the pace required by an increasingly unstable global environment.
Rebuilding trust and appeal
Addressing the crisis will require more than higher salaries or expanded recruitment drives. Defence employers must engage openly with ethical concerns, modernise workplace cultures, and demonstrate how technical skills can contribute to national security without compromising personal values. Only then can the sector hope to rebuild its appeal and secure the talent it urgently needs.










