Sports
Why Alonso’s Chances of Survival at Real Madrid Are Slim
Xabi Alonso’s future at Real Madrid hangs in the balance as the club approaches a defining moment in its season. Wednesday’s Champions League showdown against Manchester City at the Bernabeu may prove decisive for the 42 year old manager. After Sunday’s 2 0 home defeat to Celta Vigo, frustration from the stands spilled over as boos echoed around the stadium. The loss triggered an emergency meeting between senior club figures, highlighting the seriousness with which the hierarchy is evaluating Alonso’s position. With Real Madrid slipping four points behind rivals Barcelona and winning only one of their last five league matches, pressure is intensifying rapidly.
A Modern Approach Meets Traditional Resistance
Alonso arrived at Real Madrid in the summer as a forward thinking coach with a clear tactical identity. His philosophy emphasises structured build up play, fluid pressing and a more analytical approach to matches, representing a shift from the club’s historically instinctive, player led style. While his methods earned widespread praise during his time at Bayer Leverkusen, where he transformed the team into Bundesliga contenders, adapting such a model at Real Madrid has proven far more challenging.
President Florentino Perez has historically maintained a sceptical stance toward managers who introduce systematic overhaul. Although advised internally to pursue modern tacticians such as Rafa Benitez, Julien Lopetegui and now Alonso, Perez has shown little patience when early results falter. In contrast, Real Madrid’s most successful periods of the last decade came under coaches with lighter tactical footprints, like Carlo Ancelotti and Zinedine Zidane, who relied heavily on man management and player autonomy rather than structural reinvention.
A Club Unwilling to Commit to Long Term Change
Despite early enthusiasm surrounding Alonso’s appointment, the club has struggled to fully commit to the profound changes he believes are necessary. Real Madrid remains an institution where winning now is non negotiable, and any dip in form is met with immediate scrutiny. The current slump, beginning shortly after a triumph over Barcelona in October, has exposed the fragility of Alonso’s position. Once results weaken, confidence from players and directors can shift quickly, particularly when a modern, high intervention style requires full buy in from all parties.
Alonso’s training methods, tactical instructions and squad rotations are said to have generated mixed reactions within the dressing room. Some players appreciate the clarity and detail, while others find it difficult to adapt, especially with pressure rising. As soon as doubts emerge, Perez tends to revert to managerial styles that have historically delivered trophies with minimal system building.
A Curious Twist in Alonso’s Career Assurances
During his tenure at Bayer Leverkusen, Alonso negotiated a clause allowing him to leave if one of his former clubs approached him and he felt ready to accept. The list included Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Liverpool. Interestingly, Alonso added Manchester City to that list under the condition that one day he could succeed Pep Guardiola.
Yet circumstances now appear to have reversed. Guardiola’s Manchester City, a club Alonso once hoped to lead in the future, could be the team that pushes him out of his current role. Defeat in Wednesday’s Champions League tie may prompt Real Madrid to act swiftly, potentially ending Alonso’s tenure sooner than expected.
A Future Hanging by a Thread
While nothing has been formally decided, the signs are clear: Alonso is running out of time. Unless he secures a major result against Manchester City and sparks an immediate turnaround in league form, it is increasingly unlikely he will remain in charge. Real Madrid is a club that demands instant success, and the patience required for philosophical transformation rarely survives periods of struggle. Alonso’s vision may be admirable, but at a club defined by immediate results, vision alone is rarely enough.
